Moreover, these tapes improved dynamic postural control during the mSEBT compared to the control. No significant differences were identified in any of the OLST and SEBT parameters between the two different taping applications.Ĭonclusion: KT and DT improved static postural control during the OLST compared with the control condition. Further, the higher reach distances with KT compared with those in the control condition were obtained in the M and PM directions of the mSEBT. The normalized reach distances in the anteromedial (AM), medial (M), and posteromedial (PM) directions of the mSEBT significantly increased with DT compared to that in the control condition. Results: The CoP parameters (path length, ellipse area, and mean velocity) of the OLST significantly decreased on applying KT and DT compared with those when barefoot. One-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare center of pressure (CoP) data and normalized mSEBT reach distances among the three conditions (with α = 0.05). Static postural control was evaluated using the one-leg standing test (OLST) and dynamic postural control using the modified Star Excursion Balance Test (mSEBT). The participants performed tests under three conditions (barefoot, KT, and DT). Methods: Fifteen subjects with CAI were participated in this study. Objects: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of elastic ankle tapings using kinesio taping (KT) and dynamic taping (DT) on static and dynamic postural control in patients with CAI. However, equivocal evidence exists concerning the effect of elastic ankle taping on postural control. Elastic ankle tapings are commonly used to facilitate postural control in patients with CAI as well as prevent relapse of a lateral ankle sprain. Background: Postural control deficit is a major characteristic in patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |